
Hi fellow arguers! Now that you

have your first speech in the bag, you are officially "argumentative."
Or something like that....anyway, I want to know...what's up with mascots? Neve and Gliz are the goofy mascots for Torino's Winter Games on your right and for the Superbowl, we have a Seahawk named Blitz to your left....uh, well The Steelers don't have a mascot....they used to have some longshoreman dress up like an I-Beam in the eighties, but now, they just have bath towels...
hmmm...An argument in its most simple for consists of
data and claim...and a mascot is a
visual argument...search the web a bit and make a claim here backed up by data (examples, stats, effects, evidence) that you can use it when you write your
position paper (see p. 69) about mascots in general --or any of these mascots in particular or even the Steeler's lack of a Mascot, which is also a
rhetorical statement.
Ask yourselves:1. What does a mascot do? What is it for? (This is teleological question for you A students, fyi)2. Who is the mascot's audience, really? 3. Whose point of view are the characters seen from? (p. 57 in our book)4. What ethnicity or gender are these mascots if any? Why?Experiment with
voice and take a strong
rhetorical stance in your comments and respond to the questions above...backing your claims with data. Have fun with this and PUSH your critical thinking. Try to use vocabulary from our class in your response!
PS: Speaking of mascots, I think Hornets are scary, especially that gigantic two-story- one that gets tied to the library during Homecoming!